UMiDIGI A9 Pro vs Nokia C20

For:

      Better camera (815 points vs 23 points)

      Better battery (534 points vs 133 points)

      Better performance (505 points vs 14 points)

      Better connectivity (849 points vs 199 points)

      Better display (630 points vs 264 points)

      Better design (572 points vs 432 points)

Against:

      Higher price (148.19 USD vs 143.97 USD)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)

      Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3000mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)

      More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)

      More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.52 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (82.23 percents vs 77.72 percents)

For:

      Lower price (143.97 USD vs 148.19 USD)

Against:

      Worse camera (23 points vs 815 points)

      Worse battery (133 points vs 534 points)

      Worse performance (14 points vs 505 points)

      Worse connectivity (199 points vs 849 points)

      Worse display (264 points vs 630 points)

      Worse design (432 points vs 572 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4150mAh)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)

      Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.52 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (77.72 percents vs 82.23 percents)