DJI Mavic vs Aosenma Cg035
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (50.74 USD vs 171.88 USD)
Better camera (979 points vs 703 points)
Higher control distance (996 points vs 793 points)
Higher flying time (895 points vs 803 points)
Better brand (979 points vs 291 points)
Against:
Smaller dimensions (476 points vs 848 points)
Worse battery (872 points vs 947 points)
Less functions (974 points vs 981 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Bigger camera resolution (12.7 Megapixels vs 2 Megapixels)
Dimensions |
|
Control Distance |
|
For:
Higher transmitter distance (10000 meters vs 300 meters)
Battery |
|
Against:
Lower battery capacity (2375 mAh vs 3200 mAh)
Flying Time |
|
For:
Longer flying time (20 minutes vs 15 minutes)
Functions |
|
Against:
No additional gimbal
Summary |
|
For:
Bigger dimensions (848 points vs 476 points)
Better battery (947 points vs 872 points)
More functions (981 points vs 974 points)
Against:
Higher price (171.88 USD vs 50.74 USD)
Worse camera (703 points vs 979 points)
Lower control distance (793 points vs 996 points)
Lower flying time (803 points vs 895 points)
Worse brand (291 points vs 979 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Smaller camera resolution (2 Megapixels vs 12.7 Megapixels)
Dimensions |
|
Control Distance |
|
Against:
Lower transmitter distance (300 meters vs 10000 meters)
Battery |
|
For:
Higher battery capacity (3200 mAh vs 2375 mAh)
Flying Time |
|
Against:
Shorter flying time (15 minutes vs 20 minutes)
Functions |
|
For:
Has additional gimbal