Samsung Galaxy S9 SD845 vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy S9 SD845 vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (334.03 USD vs 339.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (347 points vs 377 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 749 points)
Worse performance (611 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (640 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (969 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (609 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.5 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4600mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (568 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.8 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.41 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (377 points vs 347 points)
Better battery (749 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 611 points)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 640 points)
Better display (996 points vs 969 points)
Better design (967 points vs 609 points)
Against:
Higher price (339.99 USD vs 334.03 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.5)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4600mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 5.8 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 568 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 84.41 percents)