Ulefone Armor X vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Ulefone Armor X vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (907 points vs 900 points)
Against:
Higher price (169.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (65 points vs 764 points)
Worse performance (100 points vs 471 points)
Worse connectivity (112 points vs 512 points)
Worse display (154 points vs 684 points)
Worse design (94 points vs 441 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5500mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (570 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (293 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (62.72 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 169.99 USD)
Better camera (764 points vs 65 points)
Better performance (471 points vs 100 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 112 points)
Better display (684 points vs 154 points)
Better design (441 points vs 94 points)
Against:
Worse battery (900 points vs 907 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 570 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 293 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 62.72 percents)