Xiaomi Mi 8 vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 8 vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (238 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Better performance (849 points vs 711 points)
Better display (791 points vs 523 points)
Better design (877 points vs 600 points)
Against:
Worse camera (587 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (254 points vs 869 points)
Worse connectivity (610 points vs 956 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.21 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.09 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (914 points vs 587 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 254 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 610 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 238 USD)
Worse performance (711 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (523 points vs 791 points)
Worse design (600 points vs 877 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.21 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.12 percents vs 84.09 percents)