Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S vs OnePlus 8
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S vs OnePlus 8
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (411.89 USD vs 448.56 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (436 points vs 826 points)
Worse battery (254 points vs 584 points)
Worse performance (849 points vs 929 points)
Worse connectivity (897 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (579 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (723 points vs 949 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.99 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.21 percents vs 88.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (826 points vs 436 points)
Better battery (584 points vs 254 points)
Better performance (929 points vs 849 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 897 points)
Better display (910 points vs 579 points)
Better design (949 points vs 723 points)
Against:
Higher price (448.56 USD vs 411.89 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 5.99 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.98 percents vs 82.21 percents)