Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S vs OnePlus 8
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S vs OnePlus 8
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (411.89 USD vs 448.56 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (432 points vs 823 points)
Worse battery (251 points vs 583 points)
Worse performance (846 points vs 928 points)
Worse connectivity (896 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (574 points vs 909 points)
Worse design (719 points vs 948 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.99 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.21 percents vs 88.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (823 points vs 432 points)
Better battery (583 points vs 251 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 846 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 896 points)
Better display (909 points vs 574 points)
Better design (948 points vs 719 points)
Against:
Higher price (448.56 USD vs 411.89 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 5.99 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.98 percents vs 82.21 percents)