Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact vs OnePlus 8
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact vs OnePlus 8
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (417 USD vs 448.56 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (212 points vs 825 points)
Worse battery (116 points vs 585 points)
Worse performance (610 points vs 928 points)
Worse connectivity (702 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (354 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (149 points vs 948 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (19.2 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2870mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (483 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (73.76 percents vs 88.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (825 points vs 212 points)
Better battery (585 points vs 116 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 610 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 702 points)
Better display (910 points vs 354 points)
Better design (948 points vs 149 points)
Against:
Higher price (448.56 USD vs 417 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/2)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 19.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 2870mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 483 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.98 percents vs 73.76 percents)