Apple iPhone 6s vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Apple iPhone 6s vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (226.99 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (250 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (16 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (177 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (947 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (39 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (271 points vs 929 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1715mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1840 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.7 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (326 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (65.81 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 226.99 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 250 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 16 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 177 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 947 points)
Better display (994 points vs 39 points)
Better design (929 points vs 271 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 1715mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1840 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 4.7 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 326 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 65.81 percents)