Apple iPhone 6 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Apple iPhone 6 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (610 points vs 517 points)
Against:
Higher price (201.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (79 points vs 767 points)
Worse battery (124 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (109 points vs 477 points)
Worse display (313 points vs 689 points)
Worse design (396 points vs 449 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.23 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2915mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1400 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (68.02 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 201.99 USD)
Better camera (767 points vs 79 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 124 points)
Better performance (477 points vs 109 points)
Better display (689 points vs 313 points)
Better design (449 points vs 396 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (517 points vs 610 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 1.23 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 2915mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1400 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 68.02 percents)