Cubot P20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Compare Phones: Cubot P20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (334 points vs 281 points)
Better design (630 points vs 576 points)
Against:
Higher price (101.49 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Worse camera (484 points vs 704 points)
Worse battery (309 points vs 530 points)
Worse connectivity (70 points vs 293 points)
Worse display (443 points vs 514 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.18 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.11 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (89.99 USD vs 101.49 USD)
Better camera (704 points vs 484 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 309 points)
Better connectivity (293 points vs 70 points)
Better display (514 points vs 443 points)
Against:
Worse performance (281 points vs 334 points)
Worse design (576 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.18 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 82.11 percents)