Cubot P20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Compare Phones: Cubot P20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (332 points vs 279 points)
Better design (629 points vs 574 points)
Against:
Higher price (101.49 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Worse camera (483 points vs 703 points)
Worse battery (308 points vs 530 points)
Worse connectivity (69 points vs 291 points)
Worse display (441 points vs 513 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.18 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.11 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (89.99 USD vs 101.49 USD)
Better camera (703 points vs 483 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 308 points)
Better connectivity (291 points vs 69 points)
Better display (513 points vs 441 points)
Against:
Worse performance (279 points vs 332 points)
Worse design (574 points vs 629 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.18 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 82.11 percents)