Cubot P20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Compare Phones: Cubot P20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (333 points vs 280 points)
Better design (628 points vs 573 points)
Against:
Higher price (101.49 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Worse camera (481 points vs 703 points)
Worse battery (307 points vs 530 points)
Worse connectivity (68 points vs 289 points)
Worse display (440 points vs 511 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.18 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.11 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (89.99 USD vs 101.49 USD)
Better camera (703 points vs 481 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 307 points)
Better connectivity (289 points vs 68 points)
Better display (511 points vs 440 points)
Against:
Worse performance (280 points vs 333 points)
Worse design (573 points vs 628 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.18 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 82.11 percents)