UMiDIGI Z2 Pro vs Huawei Mate 30

For:

      Lower price (164 USD vs 717.12 USD)

      Better connectivity (848 points vs 752 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (583 points vs 683 points)

      Worse battery (294 points vs 542 points)

      Worse performance (667 points vs 813 points)

      Worse display (439 points vs 491 points)

      Worse design (814 points vs 888 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

      Worse main camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (16.37 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3550mAh vs 4200mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)

      Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 16 cores)

For:

      Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 389 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.2 inch vs 6.62 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (85.14 percents vs 88.2 percents)

For:

      Better camera (683 points vs 583 points)

      Better battery (542 points vs 294 points)

      Better performance (813 points vs 667 points)

      Better display (491 points vs 439 points)

      Better design (888 points vs 814 points)

Against:

      Higher price (717.12 USD vs 164 USD)

      Worse connectivity (752 points vs 848 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

      Better main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 16.37 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4200mAh vs 3550mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More gpu cores (16 cores vs 3 cores)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.62 inch vs 6.2 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (389 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.2 percents vs 85.14 percents)