Asus ROG Phone vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Asus ROG Phone vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (398.99 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse camera (368 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (979 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (842 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (666 points vs 900 points)
Worse design (388 points vs 393 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2960 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (77.05 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 398.99 USD)
Better camera (964 points vs 368 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 979 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 842 points)
Better display (900 points vs 666 points)
Better design (393 points vs 388 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2960 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (80.18 percents vs 77.05 percents)