Sony Xperia XZ3 vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ3 vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Better display (851 points vs 517 points)
Against:
Higher price (268.99 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (557 points vs 913 points)
Worse battery (238 points vs 870 points)
Worse performance (606 points vs 707 points)
Worse connectivity (699 points vs 955 points)
Worse design (325 points vs 594 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (19.17 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3330mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (537 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.81 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 268.99 USD)
Better camera (913 points vs 557 points)
Better battery (870 points vs 238 points)
Better performance (707 points vs 606 points)
Better connectivity (955 points vs 699 points)
Better design (594 points vs 325 points)
Against:
Worse display (517 points vs 851 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 19.17 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3330mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 537 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 80.81 percents)