Huawei nova 3 vs Oukitel C17 Pro
Compare Phones: Huawei nova 3 vs Oukitel C17 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (594 points vs 167 points)
Better performance (574 points vs 387 points)
Better display (628 points vs 219 points)
Better design (949 points vs 600 points)
Against:
Higher price (139.8 USD vs 127.99 USD)
Worse battery (342 points vs 370 points)
Worse connectivity (636 points vs 675 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3750mAh vs 3900mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2360 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More gpu cores (12 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (767 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 271 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.35 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.47 percents vs 83.47 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (127.99 USD vs 139.8 USD)
Better battery (370 points vs 342 points)
Better connectivity (675 points vs 636 points)
Against:
Worse camera (167 points vs 594 points)
Worse performance (387 points vs 574 points)
Worse display (219 points vs 628 points)
Worse design (600 points vs 949 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3900mAh vs 3750mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2360 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 12 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 767 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.35 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (271 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.47 percents vs 84.47 percents)