Nokia 6.1 Plus vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Compare Phones: Nokia 6.1 Plus vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (135.99 USD vs 148.19 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (547 points vs 816 points)
Worse battery (181 points vs 533 points)
Worse performance (430 points vs 507 points)
Worse connectivity (397 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (470 points vs 631 points)
Worse design (429 points vs 574 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3060mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (435 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.8 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.62 percents vs 82.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (816 points vs 547 points)
Better battery (533 points vs 181 points)
Better performance (507 points vs 430 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 397 points)
Better display (631 points vs 470 points)
Better design (574 points vs 429 points)
Against:
Higher price (148.19 USD vs 135.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3060mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.8 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 435 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.23 percents vs 80.62 percents)