Nokia 6.1 Plus vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Compare Phones: Nokia 6.1 Plus vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (135.99 USD vs 148.19 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (546 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (181 points vs 533 points)
Worse performance (428 points vs 506 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (468 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (427 points vs 573 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3060mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (435 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.8 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.62 percents vs 82.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (815 points vs 546 points)
Better battery (533 points vs 181 points)
Better performance (506 points vs 428 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 395 points)
Better display (630 points vs 468 points)
Better design (573 points vs 427 points)
Against:
Higher price (148.19 USD vs 135.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3060mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.8 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 435 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.23 percents vs 80.62 percents)