Meizu 16 vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Compare Phones: Meizu 16 vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (335.85 USD vs 339.99 USD)
Better camera (606 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (849 points vs 757 points)
Against:
Worse battery (100 points vs 749 points)
Worse connectivity (397 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (509 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (867 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3010mAh vs 4600mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.6 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (749 points vs 100 points)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 397 points)
Better display (996 points vs 509 points)
Better design (967 points vs 867 points)
Against:
Higher price (339.99 USD vs 335.85 USD)
Worse camera (377 points vs 606 points)
Worse performance (757 points vs 849 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4600mAh vs 3010mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 84.6 percents)