Oppo R17 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Oppo R17 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (890 points vs 393 points)
Against:
Higher price (529.97 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse camera (603 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (332 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (688 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (842 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (867 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (24.84 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3700mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.4 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.8 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 529.97 USD)
Better camera (964 points vs 603 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 332 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 688 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 842 points)
Better display (900 points vs 867 points)
Against:
Worse design (393 points vs 890 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 24.84 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.4 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 85.8 percents)