Xiaomi Pocophone F1 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Pocophone F1 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (848 points vs 756 points)
Against:
Higher price (250 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (543 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 643 points)
Worse connectivity (337 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (534 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (533 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.18 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.13 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 250 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 543 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 377 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 337 points)
Better display (994 points vs 534 points)
Better design (928 points vs 533 points)
Against:
Worse performance (756 points vs 848 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.18 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 82.13 percents)