Google Pixel 3 XL vs UMiDIGI S3 Pro
Compare Phones: Google Pixel 3 XL vs UMiDIGI S3 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better display (926 points vs 628 points)
Better design (812 points vs 757 points)
Against:
Higher price (227.05 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Worse camera (197 points vs 932 points)
Worse battery (191 points vs 870 points)
Worse performance (606 points vs 708 points)
Worse connectivity (803 points vs 848 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3430mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (522 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.39 percents vs 83.4 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (174.99 USD vs 227.05 USD)
Better camera (932 points vs 197 points)
Better battery (870 points vs 191 points)
Better performance (708 points vs 606 points)
Better connectivity (848 points vs 803 points)
Against:
Worse display (628 points vs 926 points)
Worse design (757 points vs 812 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3430mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 522 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.4 percents vs 83.39 percents)