Google Pixel 3 XL vs UMiDIGI S3 Pro
Compare Phones: Google Pixel 3 XL vs UMiDIGI S3 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better display (927 points vs 630 points)
Better design (814 points vs 759 points)
Against:
Higher price (227.05 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Worse camera (198 points vs 933 points)
Worse battery (193 points vs 868 points)
Worse performance (610 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (805 points vs 850 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3430mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (522 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.39 percents vs 83.4 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (174.99 USD vs 227.05 USD)
Better camera (933 points vs 198 points)
Better battery (868 points vs 193 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 610 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 805 points)
Against:
Worse display (630 points vs 927 points)
Worse design (759 points vs 814 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3430mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 522 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.4 percents vs 83.39 percents)