Huawei Mate 20 vs OnePlus 8
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 20 vs OnePlus 8
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (425.68 USD vs 448.56 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (529 points vs 826 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 584 points)
Worse performance (579 points vs 929 points)
Worse connectivity (806 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (656 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (889 points vs 949 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (720 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Lower pixel density (381 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (88.31 percents vs 88.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (826 points vs 529 points)
Better battery (584 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (929 points vs 579 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 806 points)
Better display (910 points vs 656 points)
Better design (949 points vs 889 points)
Against:
Higher price (448.56 USD vs 425.68 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 720 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 381 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.98 percents vs 88.31 percents)