Huawei Mate 20 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite

Against:

      Higher price (425.68 USD vs 358.24 USD)

      Worse camera (525 points vs 777 points)

      Worse battery (374 points vs 577 points)

      Worse performance (572 points vs 722 points)

      Worse connectivity (803 points vs 830 points)

      Worse display (652 points vs 909 points)

      Worse design (887 points vs 993 points)

For:

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4250mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.55 inch)

      Lower pixel density (381 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.31 percents vs 85.48 percents)

For:

      Lower price (358.24 USD vs 425.68 USD)

      Better camera (777 points vs 525 points)

      Better battery (577 points vs 374 points)

      Better performance (722 points vs 572 points)

      Better connectivity (830 points vs 803 points)

      Better display (909 points vs 652 points)

      Better design (993 points vs 887 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

      Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 6.53 inches)

      Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 381 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (85.48 percents vs 88.31 percents)