OnePlus 6T vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Compare Phones: OnePlus 6T vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (319 USD vs 339.99 USD)
Better camera (636 points vs 375 points)
Better performance (848 points vs 756 points)
Better connectivity (958 points vs 832 points)
Against:
Worse battery (332 points vs 748 points)
Worse display (872 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (844 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3700mAh vs 4600mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.41 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.89 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (748 points vs 332 points)
Better display (996 points vs 872 points)
Better design (967 points vs 844 points)
Against:
Higher price (339.99 USD vs 319 USD)
Worse camera (375 points vs 636 points)
Worse performance (756 points vs 848 points)
Worse connectivity (832 points vs 958 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4600mAh vs 3700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.41 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 85.89 percents)