Apple iPhone XS Max vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Compare Phones: Apple iPhone XS Max vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (958 points vs 832 points)
Against:
Higher price (1540.64 USD vs 739.72 USD)
Worse camera (272 points vs 600 points)
Worse battery (119 points vs 772 points)
Worse performance (211 points vs 756 points)
Worse display (682 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (880 points vs 991 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.15 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3174mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (1100 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (6 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (456 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.41 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (739.72 USD vs 1540.64 USD)
Better camera (600 points vs 272 points)
Better battery (772 points vs 119 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 211 points)
Better display (996 points vs 682 points)
Better design (991 points vs 880 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (832 points vs 958 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.15 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.8)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3174mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 6 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 1100 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 456 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 85.41 percents)