Cubot King Kong 3 vs UMiDIGI S3 Pro
Compare Phones: Cubot King Kong 3 vs UMiDIGI S3 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (900 points vs 868 points)
Against:
Higher price (191.87 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Worse camera (394 points vs 933 points)
Worse performance (423 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (436 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (155 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (95 points vs 759 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (770 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (293 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (61.55 percents vs 83.4 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (174.99 USD vs 191.87 USD)
Better camera (933 points vs 394 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 423 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 436 points)
Better display (630 points vs 155 points)
Better design (759 points vs 95 points)
Against:
Worse battery (868 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 770 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 293 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.4 percents vs 61.55 percents)