Huawei Enjoy 9 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Huawei Enjoy 9 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (487 points vs 476 points)
Better design (870 points vs 447 points)
Against:
Higher price (190.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (334 points vs 766 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 900 points)
Worse connectivity (311 points vs 516 points)
Worse display (683 points vs 688 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (396 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.1 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 190.99 USD)
Better camera (766 points vs 334 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 377 points)
Better connectivity (516 points vs 311 points)
Better display (688 points vs 683 points)
Against:
Worse performance (476 points vs 487 points)
Worse design (447 points vs 870 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 396 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 83.1 percents)