Huawei Enjoy 9 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Huawei Enjoy 9 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (483 points vs 471 points)
Better design (868 points vs 441 points)
Against:
Higher price (190.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (330 points vs 764 points)
Worse battery (374 points vs 900 points)
Worse connectivity (304 points vs 512 points)
Worse display (681 points vs 684 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (396 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.1 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 190.99 USD)
Better camera (764 points vs 330 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 374 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 304 points)
Better display (684 points vs 681 points)
Against:
Worse performance (471 points vs 483 points)
Worse design (441 points vs 868 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 396 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 83.1 percents)