Oukitel U23 vs Doogee S88 Plus
Compare Phones: Oukitel U23 vs Doogee S88 Plus
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (220.99 USD vs 229.42 USD)
Better design (436 points vs 73 points)
Against:
Worse camera (384 points vs 827 points)
Worse battery (279 points vs 979 points)
Worse performance (620 points vs 880 points)
Worse connectivity (69 points vs 884 points)
Worse display (441 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (15.7 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3500mAh vs 10000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.18 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.84 percents vs 66.62 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (827 points vs 384 points)
Better battery (979 points vs 279 points)
Better performance (880 points vs 620 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 69 points)
Better display (630 points vs 441 points)
Against:
Higher price (229.42 USD vs 220.99 USD)
Worse design (73 points vs 436 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.7 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (10000mAh vs 3500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.18 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (66.62 percents vs 82.84 percents)