UMiDIGI One Max vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI One Max vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (850 points vs 516 points)
Better design (732 points vs 447 points)
Against:
Higher price (179.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (474 points vs 766 points)
Worse battery (533 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (390 points vs 476 points)
Worse display (212 points vs 688 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (15 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4150mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.84 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 179.99 USD)
Better camera (766 points vs 474 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 533 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 390 points)
Better display (688 points vs 212 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (516 points vs 850 points)
Worse design (447 points vs 732 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 15 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
Against:
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 83.84 percents)