UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Oukitel WP5 Pro
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Oukitel WP5 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (933 points vs 302 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 384 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 516 points)
Better display (630 points vs 155 points)
Better design (759 points vs 46 points)
Against:
Higher price (174.99 USD vs 164.69 USD)
Worse battery (868 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 8000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 293 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.4 percents vs 55.57 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (164.69 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Better battery (967 points vs 868 points)
Against:
Worse camera (302 points vs 933 points)
Worse performance (384 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (516 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (155 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (46 points vs 759 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (8000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (293 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (55.57 percents vs 83.4 percents)