UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A02
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A02
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (932 points vs 113 points)
Better battery (870 points vs 712 points)
Better performance (707 points vs 113 points)
Better connectivity (848 points vs 57 points)
Better display (628 points vs 180 points)
Better design (757 points vs 516 points)
Against:
Higher price (174.99 USD vs 169.71 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 259 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.4 percents vs 84.99 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (169.71 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (113 points vs 932 points)
Worse battery (712 points vs 870 points)
Worse performance (113 points vs 707 points)
Worse connectivity (57 points vs 848 points)
Worse display (180 points vs 628 points)
Worse design (516 points vs 757 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.5 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (259 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.99 percents vs 83.4 percents)