UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A02
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A02
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (933 points vs 113 points)
Better battery (868 points vs 712 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 115 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 59 points)
Better display (630 points vs 181 points)
Better design (759 points vs 521 points)
Against:
Higher price (174.99 USD vs 169.71 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 259 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.4 percents vs 84.99 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (169.71 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (113 points vs 933 points)
Worse battery (712 points vs 868 points)
Worse performance (115 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (59 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (181 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (521 points vs 759 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.5 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (259 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.99 percents vs 83.4 percents)