UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

For:

      Lower price (174.99 USD vs 278.96 USD)

      Better camera (933 points vs 669 points)

      Better battery (868 points vs 772 points)

      Better performance (711 points vs 262 points)

      Better connectivity (850 points vs 337 points)

      Better display (630 points vs 590 points)

      Better design (759 points vs 511 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 955 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 399 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.6 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.4 percents vs 82.6 percents)

Against:

      Higher price (278.96 USD vs 174.99 USD)

      Worse camera (669 points vs 933 points)

      Worse battery (772 points vs 868 points)

      Worse performance (262 points vs 711 points)

      Worse connectivity (337 points vs 850 points)

      Worse display (590 points vs 630 points)

      Worse design (511 points vs 759 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (955 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)

Against:

      Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.6 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (399 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82.6 percents vs 83.4 percents)