Cubot X19 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Compare Phones: Cubot X19 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (421 points vs 280 points)
Against:
Higher price (94.99 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Worse camera (477 points vs 703 points)
Worse battery (376 points vs 530 points)
Worse connectivity (68 points vs 289 points)
Worse display (394 points vs 511 points)
Worse design (315 points vs 573 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (407 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.93 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (78.63 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (89.99 USD vs 94.99 USD)
Better camera (703 points vs 477 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 376 points)
Better connectivity (289 points vs 68 points)
Better display (511 points vs 394 points)
Better design (573 points vs 315 points)
Against:
Worse performance (280 points vs 421 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 5.93 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 407 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 78.63 percents)