Samsung Galaxy S10 SD855 vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy S10 SD855 vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better display (977 points vs 899 points)
Better design (939 points vs 387 points)
Against:
Higher price (477.71 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse camera (322 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (187 points vs 928 points)
Worse performance (926 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (636 points vs 971 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (10.51 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (551 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.1 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.29 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 477.71 USD)
Better camera (964 points vs 322 points)
Better battery (928 points vs 187 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 926 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 636 points)
Against:
Worse display (899 points vs 977 points)
Worse design (387 points vs 939 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 10.51 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.1 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 551 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 88.29 percents)