Cubot R15 vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: Cubot R15 vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (400 points vs 202 points)
Against:
Higher price (165.5 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (50 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 772 points)
Worse performance (34 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (203 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.26 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (80.76 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 165.5 USD)
Better camera (815 points vs 50 points)
Better battery (772 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 34 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 6 points)
Better display (630 points vs 203 points)
Against:
Worse design (202 points vs 400 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.26 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 80.76 percents)