Xiaomi Redmi 7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (377 points vs 308 points)
Better connectivity (395 points vs 374 points)
Against:
Higher price (120 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (145 points vs 809 points)
Worse performance (226 points vs 464 points)
Worse display (340 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (507 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.26 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.79 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 120 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 145 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 226 points)
Better display (630 points vs 340 points)
Better design (670 points vs 507 points)
Against:
Worse battery (308 points vs 377 points)
Worse connectivity (374 points vs 395 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.26 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 81.79 percents)