Xiaomi Redmi 7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (374 points vs 304 points)
Better connectivity (390 points vs 368 points)
Against:
Higher price (120 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (143 points vs 807 points)
Worse performance (225 points vs 459 points)
Worse display (339 points vs 628 points)
Worse design (501 points vs 667 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.26 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.79 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 120 USD)
Better camera (807 points vs 143 points)
Better performance (459 points vs 225 points)
Better display (628 points vs 339 points)
Better design (667 points vs 501 points)
Against:
Worse battery (304 points vs 374 points)
Worse connectivity (368 points vs 390 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.26 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 81.79 percents)