UMiDIGI F1 Play vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F1 Play vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (868 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Higher price (279.99 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (818 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (670 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (884 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (630 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (497 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.85 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 279.99 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 818 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 670 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 884 points)
Better display (994 points vs 630 points)
Better design (928 points vs 497 points)
Against:
Worse battery (643 points vs 868 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.3 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 83.85 percents)