Oukitel K9 vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Oukitel K9 vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (927 points vs 868 points)
Better display (819 points vs 521 points)
Better design (745 points vs 599 points)
Against:
Higher price (278.99 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (513 points vs 914 points)
Worse performance (444 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (516 points vs 956 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (7.12 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (350 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.66 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 278.99 USD)
Better camera (914 points vs 513 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 444 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 516 points)
Against:
Worse battery (868 points vs 927 points)
Worse display (521 points vs 819 points)
Worse design (599 points vs 745 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 350 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 7.12 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.12 percents vs 83.66 percents)