Oukitel K9 vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Oukitel K9 vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (928 points vs 870 points)
Better display (817 points vs 517 points)
Better design (742 points vs 594 points)
Against:
Higher price (278.99 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (510 points vs 913 points)
Worse performance (439 points vs 707 points)
Worse connectivity (512 points vs 955 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (7.12 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (350 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.66 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 278.99 USD)
Better camera (913 points vs 510 points)
Better performance (707 points vs 439 points)
Better connectivity (955 points vs 512 points)
Against:
Worse battery (870 points vs 928 points)
Worse display (517 points vs 817 points)
Worse design (594 points vs 742 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 350 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 7.12 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.12 percents vs 83.66 percents)