Doogee X90 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Doogee X90 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (91.99 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (64 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (254 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (23 points vs 464 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 374 points)
Worse display (142 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (325 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.1 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (232 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.61 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 91.99 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 64 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 254 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 23 points)
Better connectivity (374 points vs 6 points)
Better display (630 points vs 142 points)
Better design (670 points vs 325 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.1 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 232 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82 percents vs 82.61 percents)