Google Pixel 3a XL vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: Google Pixel 3a XL vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (153.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Better connectivity (927 points vs 850 points)
Better design (550 points vs 202 points)
Against:
Worse camera (281 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (251 points vs 772 points)
Worse performance (96 points vs 670 points)
Worse display (390 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3700mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (76.45 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (815 points vs 281 points)
Better battery (772 points vs 251 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 96 points)
Better display (630 points vs 390 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 153.99 USD)
Worse connectivity (850 points vs 927 points)
Worse design (202 points vs 550 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 76.45 percents)