Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (707 points vs 394 points)
Against:
Higher price (411 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse camera (917 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (819 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (293 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (856 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.39 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (86.37 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 411 USD)
Better camera (964 points vs 917 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 819 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 293 points)
Better display (900 points vs 856 points)
Against:
Worse design (394 points vs 707 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.39 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 86.37 percents)