Huawei Honor 20 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Huawei Honor 20 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (489 points vs 477 points)
Better design (684 points vs 449 points)
Against:
Higher price (172.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (689 points vs 767 points)
Worse battery (254 points vs 900 points)
Worse connectivity (179 points vs 517 points)
Worse display (614 points vs 689 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (415 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.21 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.31 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 172.99 USD)
Better camera (767 points vs 689 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 254 points)
Better connectivity (517 points vs 179 points)
Better display (689 points vs 614 points)
Against:
Worse performance (477 points vs 489 points)
Worse design (449 points vs 684 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.21 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 415 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 83.31 percents)