Samsung Galaxy A90 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy A90 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (736 points vs 600 points)
Against:
Higher price (748.92 USD vs 739.72 USD)
Worse battery (332 points vs 772 points)
Worse performance (646 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 832 points)
Worse display (838 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (646 points vs 991 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3700mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.7 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (393 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (86.14 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (739.72 USD vs 748.92 USD)
Better battery (772 points vs 332 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 646 points)
Better connectivity (832 points vs 395 points)
Better display (996 points vs 838 points)
Better design (991 points vs 646 points)
Against:
Worse camera (600 points vs 736 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.7 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 393 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 86.14 percents)