Samsung Galaxy A90 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy A90 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (737 points vs 601 points)
Against:
Higher price (748.92 USD vs 739.72 USD)
Worse battery (333 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (647 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (397 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (839 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (647 points vs 991 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3700mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.7 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (393 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (86.14 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (739.72 USD vs 748.92 USD)
Better battery (773 points vs 333 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 647 points)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 397 points)
Better display (996 points vs 839 points)
Better design (991 points vs 647 points)
Against:
Worse camera (601 points vs 737 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.7 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 393 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 86.14 percents)