Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs UMiDIGI A3X
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs UMiDIGI A3X
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 111.98 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 516 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 222 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 229 points)
Better display (630 points vs 143 points)
Better design (670 points vs 360 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (374 points vs 755 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.7 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 78.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (755 points vs 374 points)
Against:
Higher price (111.98 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (516 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (222 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (229 points vs 464 points)
Worse display (143 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (360 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (78.98 percents vs 82 percents)