Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs UMiDIGI A3S
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs UMiDIGI A3S
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 81.99 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 516 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 159 points)
Better display (630 points vs 128 points)
Better design (670 points vs 341 points)
Against:
Worse battery (308 points vs 375 points)
Worse connectivity (374 points vs 755 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3950mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.7 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 75.06 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (375 points vs 308 points)
Better connectivity (755 points vs 374 points)
Against:
Higher price (81.99 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (516 points vs 809 points)
Worse performance (159 points vs 464 points)
Worse display (128 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (341 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3950mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.06 percents vs 82 percents)