Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Ulefone Armor X7

For:

      Lower price (58.82 USD vs 93.99 USD)

      Better camera (810 points vs 94 points)

      Better performance (466 points vs 153 points)

      Better display (631 points vs 46 points)

      Better design (671 points vs 60 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (309 points vs 377 points)

      Worse connectivity (376 points vs 479 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)

      More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5 inch)

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (82 percents vs 58.42 percents)

For:

      Better battery (377 points vs 309 points)

      Better connectivity (479 points vs 376 points)

Against:

      Higher price (93.99 USD vs 58.82 USD)

      Worse camera (94 points vs 810 points)

      Worse performance (153 points vs 466 points)

      Worse display (46 points vs 631 points)

      Worse design (60 points vs 671 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.3 inch)

      Lower pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (58.42 percents vs 82 percents)