Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Ulefone Note 8P
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Ulefone Note 8P
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 82.99 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 36 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 50 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 42 points)
Better connectivity (374 points vs 153 points)
Better display (630 points vs 17 points)
Better design (670 points vs 176 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 16 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 2.09 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 192 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 78.93 percents)
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (82.99 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (36 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (50 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (42 points vs 464 points)
Worse connectivity (153 points vs 374 points)
Worse display (17 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (176 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (16 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (2.09 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (192 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (78.93 percents vs 82 percents)