Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Doogee X95 Pro

For:

      Lower price (58.82 USD vs 123.29 USD)

      Better camera (809 points vs 245 points)

      Better performance (464 points vs 282 points)

      Better connectivity (374 points vs 153 points)

      Better display (630 points vs 377 points)

      Better design (670 points vs 650 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (308 points vs 612 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4350mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.52 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82 percents vs 82.85 percents)

For:

      Better battery (612 points vs 308 points)

Against:

      Higher price (123.29 USD vs 58.82 USD)

      Worse camera (245 points vs 809 points)

      Worse performance (282 points vs 464 points)

      Worse connectivity (153 points vs 374 points)

      Worse display (377 points vs 630 points)

      Worse design (650 points vs 670 points)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4350mAh vs 4000mAh)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.52 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (82.85 percents vs 82 percents)