Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Doogee X95 Pro

For:

      Lower price (58.82 USD vs 123.29 USD)

      Better camera (810 points vs 246 points)

      Better performance (466 points vs 284 points)

      Better connectivity (376 points vs 154 points)

      Better display (631 points vs 379 points)

      Better design (671 points vs 651 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (309 points vs 611 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4350mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.52 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82 percents vs 82.85 percents)

For:

      Better battery (611 points vs 309 points)

Against:

      Higher price (123.29 USD vs 58.82 USD)

      Worse camera (246 points vs 810 points)

      Worse performance (284 points vs 466 points)

      Worse connectivity (154 points vs 376 points)

      Worse display (379 points vs 631 points)

      Worse design (651 points vs 671 points)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4350mAh vs 4000mAh)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.52 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (82.85 percents vs 82 percents)