Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Doogee S88 Plus
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Doogee S88 Plus
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (212.82 USD vs 229.42 USD)
Better camera (963 points vs 827 points)
Better display (689 points vs 631 points)
Better design (636 points vs 74 points)
Against:
Worse battery (519 points vs 979 points)
Worse performance (483 points vs 880 points)
Worse connectivity (376 points vs 884 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.14 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 10000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 3 cores)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.19 percents vs 66.62 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (979 points vs 519 points)
Better performance (880 points vs 483 points)
Better connectivity (884 points vs 376 points)
Against:
Higher price (229.42 USD vs 212.82 USD)
Worse camera (827 points vs 963 points)
Worse display (631 points vs 689 points)
Worse design (74 points vs 636 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.14 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (10000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 4 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (66.62 percents vs 85.19 percents)