UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A51
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A51
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 262.59 USD)
Better battery (870 points vs 305 points)
Better performance (708 points vs 498 points)
Better connectivity (955 points vs 148 points)
Against:
Worse camera (913 points vs 922 points)
Worse display (518 points vs 793 points)
Worse design (595 points vs 877 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.12 percents vs 87.72 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (922 points vs 913 points)
Better display (793 points vs 518 points)
Better design (877 points vs 595 points)
Against:
Higher price (262.59 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse battery (305 points vs 870 points)
Worse performance (498 points vs 708 points)
Worse connectivity (148 points vs 955 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (87.72 percents vs 83.12 percents)