UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A21s
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A21s
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (914 points vs 66 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 23 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 83 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 39 points)
Better display (523 points vs 97 points)
Better design (600 points vs 213 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 247.56 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.01 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 2000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 1 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 400 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 336 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 60.8 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (247.56 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (66 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (23 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (83 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (39 points vs 956 points)
Worse display (97 points vs 523 points)
Worse design (213 points vs 600 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.01 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 3 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (400 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (336 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (60.8 percents vs 83.12 percents)