Huawei Mate 30 RS vs OnePlus 8 Pro
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 30 RS vs OnePlus 8 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (989 points vs 929 points)
Against:
Higher price (1814.11 USD vs 662.31 USD)
Worse camera (821 points vs 951 points)
Worse battery (643 points vs 704 points)
Worse connectivity (833 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (676 points vs 990 points)
Worse design (807 points vs 907 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4510mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 513 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (94.36 percents vs 91.14 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (662.31 USD vs 1814.11 USD)
Better camera (951 points vs 821 points)
Better battery (704 points vs 643 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 833 points)
Better display (990 points vs 676 points)
Better design (907 points vs 807 points)
Against:
Worse performance (929 points vs 989 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4510mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Higher pixel density (513 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (91.14 percents vs 94.36 percents)